<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Solutions holding domains to ransom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/</link>
	<description>Motorcycles, computers and beer</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-17154</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-17154</guid>
		<description>Very informative article, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative article, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-16229</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-16229</guid>
		<description>wow! great article. thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! great article. thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Solutions (NetSol) ransom at Ambrand Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-14263</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Solutions (NetSol) ransom at Ambrand Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-14263</guid>
		<description>[...] to www.networksolutions.com and check if a random domain is available (I tried f5ke00gpl.com and it was). Sit back for 5 minutes. Then do a WHOIS using your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to <a href="http://www.networksolutions.com" >http://www.networksolutions.com</a> and check if a random domain is available (I tried f5ke00gpl.com and it was). Sit back for 5 minutes. Then do a WHOIS using your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11844</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11844</guid>
		<description>Yes, I saw the /. article, and particularly enjoyed this comment:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=410854&#38;cid=21958492

(Interestingly, and perhaps as a reaction to the above post(s), they've changed their domain-squatting page that used to feature a smug blond-haired blue-eyed guy to a simple "website under construction page".)

I tried it myself, and then at this month's HertsLUG meeting gave a demonstration with a randomly-picked domain shouted from the floor:

http://www.networksolutionsstealthis.com

This was originally freely available (although someone had beaten us to the .co.uk and .de variants ;-) But after about a minute, they'd sat on it.

Their CEO (who apparently likes goatse) gave a response claiming that they were protecting their customers. Yeah right, without telling anyone.

I doubt there is much that can be done. It doesn't cost them anything, so they will keep doing it. Hopefully their company's reputation is now worth 0.02c.

I think we need a separate interweb for such lamers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I saw the /. article, and particularly enjoyed this comment:</p>
<p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=410854&amp;cid=21958492" >http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=410854&amp;cid=21958492</a></p>
<p>(Interestingly, and perhaps as a reaction to the above post(s), they&#8217;ve changed their domain-squatting page that used to feature a smug blond-haired blue-eyed guy to a simple &#8220;website under construction page&#8221;.)</p>
<p>I tried it myself, and then at this month&#8217;s HertsLUG meeting gave a demonstration with a randomly-picked domain shouted from the floor:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.networksolutionsstealthis.com" >http://www.networksolutionsstealthis.com</a></p>
<p>This was originally freely available (although someone had beaten us to the .co.uk and .de variants <img src='http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> But after about a minute, they&#8217;d sat on it.</p>
<p>Their CEO (who apparently likes goatse) gave a response claiming that they were protecting their customers. Yeah right, without telling anyone.</p>
<p>I doubt there is much that can be done. It doesn&#8217;t cost them anything, so they will keep doing it. Hopefully their company&#8217;s reputation is now worth 0.02c.</p>
<p>I think we need a separate interweb for such lamers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpresh</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11803</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11803</guid>
		<description>@Sam:

Of course - but that's 4 days too long, and, as you commented on the other post, when the domain drops there's a good chance that the bottom-feeders of the domain market will immediately snap it up, so if the original user who searched for it waits for NS to drop it, they'll probably not be able to register it anyway.

ICANN recently appealed for reports of domain front-running, so I sent them a report of NS's behaviour last night - I doubt they'll have the cojones to do anything, but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sam:</p>
<p>Of course - but that&#8217;s 4 days too long, and, as you commented on the other post, when the domain drops there&#8217;s a good chance that the bottom-feeders of the domain market will immediately snap it up, so if the original user who searched for it waits for NS to drop it, they&#8217;ll probably not be able to register it anyway.</p>
<p>ICANN recently appealed for reports of domain front-running, so I sent them a report of NS&#8217;s behaviour last night - I doubt they&#8217;ll have the cojones to do anything, but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Kington</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11786</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Kington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11786</guid>
		<description>They'll only own these domains for 4 days, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll only own these domains for 4 days, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpresh</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11765</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11765</guid>
		<description>Oh, and if ICANN aren't annoyed enough by these tactics, I'm sure they won't like the fact that Network Solutions are the proud owners of &lt;a href="http://icann-can-lick-our-butthole.com/"&gt;icann-can-lick-our-butthole.com&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if ICANN aren&#8217;t annoyed enough by these tactics, I&#8217;m sure they won&#8217;t like the fact that Network Solutions are the proud owners of <a href="http://icann-can-lick-our-butthole.com/">icann-can-lick-our-butthole.com</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpresh</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11764</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11764</guid>
		<description>And the folks at Slashdot have got them to register lots of controversial domains, including &lt;a href="http://network-solutions-supports-terrorism.com/"&gt;network-solutions-supports-terrorism.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://osama-bin-laden-is-hiding-at-network-solutions.com/"&gt;osama-bin-laden-is-hiding-at-network-solutions.com&lt;/a&gt;,  &lt;a href="http://george-bush-should-be-assasinated.com/"&gt;george-bush-should-be-assasinated.com&lt;/a&gt; (nice spelling though), and even stuff that might get them in trouble for registering domains containing trademarks like &lt;a href="http://authenticdisneymerchandise.com/"&gt;authenticdisneymerchandise.com&lt;/a&gt;. 

I'd love to know how many domains they've snapped up since everyone reading the &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/08/1920215"&gt;Slashdot article about this&lt;/a&gt; got involved.

It does seem as though they've stopped snaffling domains I've searched for though... either they'll only do so many per IP, or they've disabled it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the folks at Slashdot have got them to register lots of controversial domains, including <a href="http://network-solutions-supports-terrorism.com/">network-solutions-supports-terrorism.com</a>, <a href="http://osama-bin-laden-is-hiding-at-network-solutions.com/">osama-bin-laden-is-hiding-at-network-solutions.com</a>,  <a href="http://george-bush-should-be-assasinated.com/">george-bush-should-be-assasinated.com</a> (nice spelling though), and even stuff that might get them in trouble for registering domains containing trademarks like <a href="http://authenticdisneymerchandise.com/">authenticdisneymerchandise.com</a>. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to know how many domains they&#8217;ve snapped up since everyone reading the <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/08/1920215">Slashdot article about this</a> got involved.</p>
<p>It does seem as though they&#8217;ve stopped snaffling domains I&#8217;ve searched for though&#8230; either they&#8217;ll only do so many per IP, or they&#8217;ve disabled it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpresh</title>
		<link>http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11762</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11762</guid>
		<description>They do it not only for domains checked via their website, but also for ones checked on their whois server.

I verified with:

&lt;code&gt;
whois -h whois.networksolutions.com stop-stealing-domain-names-you-bastards.com
&lt;/code&gt;

Sure enough, a few minutes later, they'd registered it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do it not only for domains checked via their website, but also for ones checked on their whois server.</p>
<p>I verified with:</p>
<p><code><br />
whois -h whois.networksolutions.com stop-stealing-domain-names-you-bastards.com<br />
</code></p>
<p>Sure enough, a few minutes later, they&#8217;d registered it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
